Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Education Overhaul

January 5,2010

San Francisco Chronicle

Marisa Lagos

"The California Legislature is poised to pass an education plan today that makes far-reaching changes to how public schools are governed, giving parents the power to transfer their kids out of failing schools and to force districts to overhaul bad schools.
The dramatic changes to California's education policies have been debated for months. They are intended to make the state competitive for up to $700 million in federal dollars under President Obama's $4.3 billion Race to the Top program, which promises funding to states that embrace education policies outlined by the president by a Jan. 19 application deadline. Millions more dollars may also be at stake for the financially struggling state, as the Obama administration is expected to tie future education funding to some of his Race to the Top provisions.
The most controversial elements of the plan being voted on today by both houses of the Legislature include the so-called open enrollment and parent trigger provisions, which were championed by a number of parents groups and charter school advocates but opposed by many in the education establishment, including the state's powerful teachers' union.
Under current state law, students must attend a school in the district where they live, with some exceptions. The open enrollment legislation would allow students in the 1,000 worst schools in California - as defined by their Academic Performance Index ranking - to apply to a better school anywhere in the state, including in the same district. School districts must adopt standards for accepting or rejecting transfers under this new open enrollment policy.
The parent trigger provision would allow parents to force school districts to deal with chronically failing schools by adopting one of several "reform" plans put forth by the Obama administration, including closing the school, firing the principal and up to half of the teachers, or turning the school into a charter school. At least 50 percent of parents would have to petition for the change.
'Paradigm shift'
"We think the parent trigger especially is critically important - it's not just a new policy, it's a paradigm shift, a different way of thinking about education reform," said Ben Austin, who founded the Los Angeles-based parent advocacy group Parent Revolution. "This is not about anything other than giving parents power and trusting them to do right by their kids. The system is failing ... because it's not designed to serve kids, it's designed to serve grown-ups."
Parents aren't the only ones who would be able to force a change: Under the legislation, the state's worst schools would have to embrace one of those strategies as well. State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell said Monday that about 800 of the state's nearly 1,700 local districts and charter schools have indicated their intent to participate in Race to the Top.
Districts that participate agree to open up all their schools to the rules; districts that choose not to participate are still subject to the rules for their low-performing schools.
The new legislation would also make a number of other changes to help bring California in line with the federal goals. The state would create a system to track students from elementary school through college to determine what is working, make a new program for credentialing math and science teachers, and allow local school districts to use test scores and other data to evaluate teachers and principals.
Delayed by politics
"These and other reforms clearly set the stage for the governor to submit a competitive application for California to bring home a coveted Race to the Top grant," Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, D-Baldwin Vista (Los Angeles County), said Monday.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger called a special session of the Legislature in August to bring California in line with the requirements outlined by the Race to the Top. But the changes have been mired in politics, with Assembly Democrats supporting limited changes backed by the teacher's union and others. The governor threatened to veto an earlier bill by the Assembly that he said omitted the open-enrollment rule, and negotiations dragged on through December. This week, officials ultimately decided to break the open enrollment and parent trigger provisions into a separate bill from the rest of the proposed changes, though both bills are expected to pass today."

Competition for the school tax dollar is a good idea.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

If legislation like this can be passed in The People's Republic of California then something similar can be passed in Pa.

Anonymous said...

I know this is unrelated but, has anyone heard anymore about the million dollar lawsuit by the steel contractor for construction of the school eight years ago? I heard the school district just lost an appeal and has to pay over 2 million dollars! My understanding is that now the contractor can garnish the school district's bank accounts!

Anonymous said...

Whatever happened you won't hear it from the school board. After all, it's only OUR money, what right do we have to know anything?

Anonymous said...

Judgment Details
Plaintiff AMTHOR STEEL INC
Defendant OLEY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Date 1/7/2010
Amount 2,187,089.35

This is the belated Christmas Gift to the Oley taxpayers!

Anonymous said...

Those responsible for this drama need to be held accountable.

The taxpayers in this district work hard for their dollars, and in addition to the White House shenanigans going on, now we have to deal with it on a local level.

Someone should pay and it isn't the taxpayer.

Anonymous said...

OVSD continues their losing streak in their battle with the steel contractor?!

OVSD filed with the Court of Common Pleas to avoid arbitration - and LOST!

OVSD then appealed that decision - and LOST!

OVSD tried to have the arbitrator disqualified - and LOST!

OVSD finally goes to arbitration - and LOST!

OVSD tried to have the award dismissed - AND LOST AGAIN!

It seems like all OVSD is accomplishing is wasting taxpayer money and giving it to their attorneys. Now they must either pay over $2million or waste more money on an appeal.

JUST PAY THE CONTRACTOR ALREADY AND MOVE ON.

Anonymous said...

Oley won't be satisfied until the amount owed is over $5,000,000! Rather than face the taxpayers and say they made a mistake, they would rather run up the bill.

Questions that need to be asked are:

1. Who from our district was overseeing this project?

2. How did we get here and why?

3. Who is advising the school district to continue on this downward spiral?

Anonymous said...

The big question, though, is where can we go to get the real answers. The board and it's incompetent attorney stonewall answers, hide behind "confidentiality" and obfuscate responsibility.

Nothing less than the resignation of the Board President should be expected as a result of this fiasco.

Anonymous said...

For those of you who say the blog is dead - we new it would not take too long for the Oley School District to find itself in another mess.

Anonymous said...

'For those of you who say the blog is dead - we new it would not take too long for the Oley School District to find itself in another mess.'

- Its not another mess it is a ten year old mess that the current board needs to figure out how to get out of. That is, if there is a way to get out of this mess.

Anonymous said...

OVSD Combined Meeting:
January 13,2010
7:00PM
Administration Building Board Room

Anonymous said...

UNBELIEVABLE! OVSD has appealed the latest decision of the court. I'm not attorney, but even I can see that OVSD has no chance of winning after their unbroken string of losses on this one!

NOW they have to pay more attorney fees! No wonder the attorneys are advising them to keep this ridiculous lawsuit going!

AND they either have to pay for a bond or have the contractor proceed with execution on the judgment, including on property and bank accounts. What will the teachers think when the money starts coming out of the bank accounts that pay their salaries?

I guess we all should get out checkbooks now. At 6% interest per year, the taxpayers are paying over $330 PER DAY just to keep this thing going. Considering that an appeal will probably take a year or two, we will be paying another $150,000 - $200,000.

So, instead of paying the contracter the $1.4 million originally sought, OVSD will be paying $2.5 million plus costs and attorney fees. Oh, well, what's an extra million or two when it's not your money, right OVSD School Board?

OVSD meeting tonight? Oh yeah...there is a lot to be said!

Anonymous said...

At the meeting last night did anyone on the board tell the public where this money is going to come from to pay off the steel company? Did they have the guts to stand up and say, "well, folks, because of our miscalculation and questionable advice from council, you taxpayers on on the hook for over a million dollars"?

Now they are going to meet to decide if they want to appeal once again? One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result. Under that definition this board is certifiably insane!

Anonymous said...

The article in the paper about the district not paying a steel contractor raises some serious concerns. Over the years, we trusted the board to be good stewards of our tax dollars. Now, we discover we have been deceived. Their actions make the Oley School District like a deadbeat.We will probably have to pay higher taxes to cover for their failure.
Someone must be held accountable for this malfeasance.

Anonymous said...

Why should taxpayers ever pay $900,000 for the board stupidity ? Can't they be sued for this?

Anonymous said...

We have been paying for board stupidity for many years. What's another $900,000 ??